Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
B M SHYAM PRASAD, K. V. ARAVIND, JJ
EXOTIC MILE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DPAC VENTURES LLP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and background of commercial appeals. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. trademark conflict between plaintiff and defendant. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. assessment criteria for interim injunction. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final orders and directions from the court. (Para 8 , 17) |
| 5. arguments from defendant regarding the injunction order. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 6. court's reasons for modifying the injunction. (Para 14) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD) The appeal in COMAP No.530/2025 is by the defendant in the commercial Suit in Commercial O.S. No.199/2025 on the file of the XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru [for short, 'the commercial Court']. The other appeal in appeal in COMAP No.534/2025 is by the plaintiff. The parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the commercial suit in Com. O.S. No.199/2025.
2. The defendant is aggrieved by the commercial Court's order dated 27.09.2025 on I.A. No.2 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [for short, 'the CPC'] as also the commercial Court's direction to the plaintiff to approach the District Legal Services Authority, Bengaluru Rural Distr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
