SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38535

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
SRI. SANDEEP – Appellant
Versus
H T SRINIVASA NAYAKA – Respondent
CRP 633/2024



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 633 OF 2024 (IO)

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. SANDEEP S/O SOORANAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 2. SRI. SOORNAYAKA S/O LATE MALLANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS BOTH ARE R/O NERALAGUNE VILLAGE CHALLAKERE TALUK - 577 522.

…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BALARAJ A.C., ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed AND:

by SHARADAVANI B

1. H T SRINIVASA NAYAKA Location: High Court of S/O LATE H.D. THIPPESWAMY, Karnataka AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O BASAPPANAHATTI VILLAGE JAGLUR TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 528.

2. G C SATHISHA S/O G.B. CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O AMOGHA LAYOUT, BANK COLONY, CHITRADURGA CITY - 577 501.

3. MANJUNATH R.

S/O RUDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS LAND DEVELOPER R/O DHARANI, JOGIMATTI ROAD, 5TH CROSS CHITRADURGA CITY - 577 501

4. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA R/P BY CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001

5. THE SUB REGISTRAR, CHITRADURGA SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, NEAR TALUK OFFICE, CHITRADURGA - 577 501

6. THE TAHASILADAR CHITRADURGA TALUK OFFICE CHITRADURGA - 577 501

7. THE TAHASILDAR CHALLAKERE TALUK OFFICE, CHALLAKERE - 577 522.

8. THE TAHASILDAR HIRIYUR TALUK OFFICE HIRIYUR - 572 143.

9. THE TAHASILDAR JAGALURU TLAUK OFFICE JAGALUR - 577 528.

10. THE ADLR CHITRADURGA A.D.L.R. OFFICE CHITRADURGA - 577 501.

11. THE CITY MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA CITY MUNICIPALITY CHITRADURGA - 577 501.

12. THE CHANCELLOR DAVANGERE UNIVERISITY, DAVANGERE - 577 002. 13. THE CHANCELLOR GULBARGA UNIVERSITY GULBARGA - 585 101. 14. THE CHANCELLOR SHIVAMOGGA UNIVERSITY SHIVOMOGA - 577 201.

15. THE DDLR CHITRADURGA DIST, DDLR OFFICE NEAR DC OFFICE CHITRADURGA - 577 501

16. THE DDLR DAVANAGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE - 577 002.

17. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, OFFICE OF THE DDPI GAYATHRI CIRCLE, CHITRADURGA CITY - 577 501.

18. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER OFFICE OF B.E.O.

CHITRADURGA - 577 501.

19. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER OFFICE OF B.E.O MOLAKALMURU - 577 535

20. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER OFFICE OF B.E.O.

CHALLAKERE - 577 522

21. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, OFFICE OF THE DDPI DAVANAGERE CITY - 577 002.

22. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER OFFICE OF B.E.O JAGALUR - 577 528.

23. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PU BOARD NEAR BOYS JUNIOR COLLEGE CHITRADURGA. 24. THE DDPU DAVANAGERE PRE UNIVERSITY, DAVANAGERE - 577 002.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R. SHASHIDHARA, AGA FOR C/R1 AND R2 NOTICE TO R3 TO R24 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 08.10.2025)

THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.08.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.

12 IN OS NO.211/2023 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITRADURGA, REJECTING THE IA NO. 12 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a)(b) AND (d) R/W SEC. 151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

Heard Sri. A.C. Balaraj, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Sri. R. Shashidhara, learned counsel for caveator/respondent No.1.

2. Defendant is the revision petitioner challenging the order of rejection of his application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure to reject the plaint in O.S. No. 211/2023.

3. Facts of the case which are utmost necessary for disposal of the present revision petition are as under:

3.1 A suit came to be filed in O.S. No.211/2023 by the respondents against 24 defendants.

3.2 Revision petitioners are the defendants No.1 and 2.

3.3 Suit was filed with the following prayer:

(cid:1) To restrain defendants No.1 to 3 from creating any type of sale deeds, agreements, Gift deeds, Mortgage, lien and other any type of alienation documents or registered testamentary for borrowing loans from the Bank Institutions or other Financial Institutions or in favour of third persons in respect of all suit schedule properties by putting undue influence and force with misconceived facts upon defendant No.1's wife Divyasaraswathi (men

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top