Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR, J
PRAMODH K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the petitioners and context of the bail applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments pertaining to the bail and the nature of offences. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis on the investigation status and petitioners' profiles. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. judicial reasoning supporting the granting of bail. (Para 9) |
ORAL ORDER
2. All the petitions are filed seeking bail/anticipatory bail in Crime No.30/2025 of Cyber Crime Police Station, Bangalore, registered for offences punishable under Section 67 , 66(C) of INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT , 2000, Sections 351 (2), 351(3), 352, 75(1)(iv), 79 of BNS , 2023.
4. The counsels for petitioners would contend that the offences under Section 351 (2), 351(3), 352, 79 of BNS are bailable and Section 67 and 66(C) of INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT , 2000 are also bailable and only one offence which is non-bailable is Section 75 (1)(iv) of and that is punishable with imprisonment for one year. As the offence has been taken place through online account, there is no question of any tampering with the investigation. The major portion of the investigation is already completed. Accused No.11 is aged 18 years old and a student. As the complainant i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
