SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38735

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
B VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner - sole accused seeks quashing of the impugned proceedings pursuant to the complaint and FIR registered as Crime No.243/2025 dated 31.05.2025 against the petitioner for alleged offences punishable under Sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 137(2) and 64(2)(m) of the BNS, 2023 and for other reliefs.

2. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl.SPP for the 1st respondent - State as well as learned counsel for 2nd respondent and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the alleged victim Kum.Bindu is the niece of the 2nd respondent - de facto complainant, who initially filed a complaint dated 28.05.2025 registered as an FIR in Crime No.229/2025 as a missing complaint on the ground that the said Kum.Bindu who did not have any parents and was being looked after by the 2nd respondent was missing. In the said complaint, the 2nd respondent - de facto complainant stated that the victim was aged about 18 years and was studying inB.Com. I year in Seshadripuram college, Yelahanka, Bangalore and staying in the Hostel. Subsequently, the 2nd respondent - de facto complainant fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top