SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38791

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.INDIRESH
EMBASSY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ITI LIMITED – Respondent


CAV ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner has sought for an appointment of Sole Arbitrator as per clause 7.7 of the Lease Deed dated 22nd June, 2018 (Annexure-A) for resolution of the dispute/differences between the parties.

2. The facts in nutshell for the purpose of adjudication of this petition are that the petitioner is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged in rendering services in the area of property management. The respondent floated a tender dated 13th February, 2017 to offer the lease of the property in question and pursuant to the same, the petitioner- Company had participated in the bid and declared as successful bidder. Thereafter, the parties have entered into an agreement as per lease deed dated 22nd June, 2018 (Annexure-A) and the schedule property was leased by the respondent to the petitioner for an initial period of 4 years 11 months. The lease of the schedule property was to be extended as per clause 2.3 of the Lease Deed dated 22nd June, 2018 (Annexure-A). It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner-Company exercised its option to renew the lease, for which, the respondent replied that the rent is on the lower side for commercial spa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top