Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Orders No-Fault Vaccine Compensation Policy
11 Mar 2026
Maintenance to Wife Should Not Encourage Idleness or Be Excessive: Gujarat HC Reduces Family Court Enhancement under CrPC Ss.125,127
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRAMOULI – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 26741 OF 2023 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3, 5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK, 80 FEE ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095
2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), NO. 21/16, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, RESIDENCY ROAD, NAZARBAD, MYSURU - 570 010 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed CHANDRAMOULI, by CHANDANA NO 748/3, GANGA ENGINEERING WORKS B M HUNSUR ROAD YELWAL, Location: High MYSURU - 571 130 Court of Karnataka KARNATAKA …RESPONDENT (VIDE ORDER DATED 10.10.2025, NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 26.05.2023 BEARING M.P. NO. 98/BANG/2023 (IN ITA NO. 3/BANG/2022
A change in law cannot serve as grounds for reviewing previous Tribunal rulings, reaffirming that adjudications must follow the law as it was at the time of the original decision.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act allows for the rectification of apparent mistakes in the Tribunal's order, without revisi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article