Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
UMESH M ADIGA, J
PREMA D/O DINESH C Y – Appellant
Versus
SANTHOSH KUMAR S S/O CHIKKEGOWDA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeal case details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. accident caused by negligent riding. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. tribunal's assessment of evidence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. arguments regarding inadequacy of compensation. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. claimants' appeal on negligence assignment. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. defendant's contestation of negligence and compensation awarded. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 7. legal interpretation of negligence based on license validity. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. assessment of claimant's earning capacity post-injury. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 9. final assessment of compensation amounts. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 10. final judgment and order details. (Para 21 , 22) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Both these appeals arises out of common judgment and award dated 29.03.2019 passed in MVC Nos.1303/2018 and 1304/2018 by the 4th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hassan District (sit at Channarayapatna), (for short ‘the Tribunal’). The claimant in MVC No.1303/2018 filed appeal in MFA No.804/2020 and claimant in MVC No.1304/2018 filed MFA No.620/2020 seeking enhancement of compensation.
Both the claim petitions arise out of a common accident and therefore, taken up for common disposal.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
