Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. V SRISHANANDA, J
SMT. N MEENA D/O BHASKAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT V JAYAMMA D/O H. VENKATAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. key rule on hindu succession rights and plaint rejection (Para 10 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. arguments on legal grounds for plaint rejection (Para 13 , 17 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. court's analysis on plaint dismissal reasoning (Para 16 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. conclusion of the revision petition (Para 29) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Raikote, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Hegde S. Ramakrishna, learned counsel for the contesting respondent.
2. Present Revision Petition is filed by the defendant No.2 challenging the order of dismissal of application filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure by considered Order dated 10.02.2025 passed in O.S No.70/2016 on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kolar.
3. Facts in the nutshell for the disposal of the present revision petition are as under:
A suit came to be filed by the first respondent in O.S No.70/2016 with the following prayer:
“WHEREFORE, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass Judgment and Decree in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants;
a) To direct the defendant to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
