Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. ASHOK S.KINAGI, J
SRI RAJARAM M SHETTY – Appellant
Versus
BHARATIYA RESERVE BANK NOTE MUDRAN (P) LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's promotion history and grievances. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's evaluation of promotion claims and merits. (Para 4 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. arguments on the promotional process and challenges. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. legal principles regarding promotion rights and eligibility. (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 21) |
| 5. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 23) |
ORAL ORDER
"i. Call for records leading to the publication of Select list dated 18.05.2022
iii. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Selection List dated 18.05.2022 by which the Respondent No. 2 have declared a list of officers/ Respondents No. 5 to 11 who have been selected for promotion to the post of Deputy General Manager as per ANNEXURE -P.
v. Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents No.1 to 3 to consider the case of the Petitioner for upgradation of the entries in the Annual Appraisal Reports.
vii. Issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction that deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity."
2.1. Respondents No.1 to 4 offered the petitioner the post of Deputy Manager on 15.03.1996. The petitioner accepted t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
