SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39113

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
MR C GOPALAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


CAV ORDER

In this petition, petitioner - sole accused seeks quashing of the impugned complaint and FIR dated 29.04.2024 registered in Crime No.366/2024 by the 1st respondent - Police, pursuant to a complaint dated 29.04.2024 lodged by the 2nd respondent - de facto complainant for alleged offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468 and 471 IPC and for other reliefs.

2. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl.SPP for 1st respondent-State and learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and perused the material on record.

3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the impugned complaint and FIR in order to contend that necessary ingredients constituting the alleged offences have not been made out by the 2nd respondent. It was submitted that the petitioner and 2nd respondent and his brothers Sri.N.M.Tulasi Ram and Sri.N.M.Ravi had entered into agreements in relation to immovable property from 2003 onwards and the 2nd respondent is illegally attempting to convert an alleged civil dispute into a criminal action by filing the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top