Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. V SRISHANANDA, J
SMT. JESINTHA PHILOMENA D SOUZA W/O B ANTHONY MENDOZ – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land acquisition details established. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. court analysis of statutory compliance on applications. (Para 6 , 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. claimant's arguments regarding error in delay assessment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. application of principles from precedent cases. (Para 11 , 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. conclusion - revision petition allowed. (Para 24) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Even though the matter is listed for admission, by the consent of the parties, matter is taken up for final disposal, having regard to the short question involved, which to be decided in this revision petition and also taking note of the fact that the award amount carries interest at the rate of 15% per annum.
4. Facts in the nutshell which are utmost necessary for disposal of the revision petition are as under:
5.2. Land of the revision petitioner in Sy.No.57 situated at Gadikoppa village, Shivamogga Taluk is acquired by fixing the compensation at the rate of Rs.3,50,000/- per acre.
5.4. However, one of the similarly placed land losers – claimant, filed a reference petition under Section 18 of the Act which was numbered as LAC No.15/2014.
5.6. Soon after the claimant came to know that similar land losers had obtained the co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
