SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39407

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.Krishna Kumar, J
Mujeeb Rehman – Appellant
Versus
Commercial Tax Officer Audit – Respondent
WP No. 62 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shreehari Kutsa
For the Respondents: Jyoti M. Maradi

Provisional attachment orders under taxation law are valid only for one year of operation. Upon the expiry of this statutory limit, the attachment ceases to have effect. Authorities cannot circumvent this limitation by issuing fresh or renewed attachment orders on the same grounds where no such authority is granted.

Headnote:(A) Taxation Law - Provisional attachment of property - Period of validity - The attachment ceases to have effect after the expiry of one year from the date of the order - Authorities are not empowered to issue fresh or new orders upon the expiry of the mandatory one-year period. (Paras 3, 4, 30, 41)

(B) Statutory Power - Exercise of discretion - Limitations - Executive authority cannot exercise powers not explicitly conferred by legislation, nor can it bypass statutory time limits through indirect means - Such powers must strictly adhere to the legislative framework provided. (Paras 17, 30, 39)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged several orders regarding the provisional attachment of bank accounts and properties issued by tax authorities. The petitioner contended that the orders had surpassed the statutory one-year duration and were, therefore, legally invalid and unenforceable.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the law mandates a strict one-year limit for provisional attachments to protect public revenue. Post-expiry, the attached assets must be released, and the authorities lack the legal mandate to re-issue attachments based on the same underlying grounds.

Issues: Whether provisional attachment orders issued by tax authorities remain valid after one year and whether it is permissible to issue fresh attachment orders upon the expiration of the first one.

Ratio Decidendi: A statutory authority cannot perform acts not authorized by the governing legislation. As the law provides for a fixed duration for attachment and contains no provision for renewal or fresh issuance upon expiry, such actions would violate the statutory intent and constitute an abuse of process.

Result: Petition disposed of as the orders have ceased to exist by operation of law; authorities are prohibited from issuing further provisional attachment orders under the specified legislation.

Table of Content
1. statutory requirements for section 83 provisional attachment of property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. provisional attachment expires after one year and renewal is barred. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. disposal of pending petition due to expiry of statutory attachment period. (Para 7 , 8)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER UNDER 83 OF KGST/CGST ACT, 2017 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 ON 27/09/2024 BEARING COMMON REFERENCE NO.CTO(A)-5/MNG/GST/INS-1/2024-25 IN FORM GST DRC-22 ISSUED TO ATTACH THE SB A/C.NO.23531 AT CANARA BANK IN THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AND ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE B1 AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

1. In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:

"a. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Order under 83 of KGST/CGST Act, 2017 passed by the Respondent No.1 on 27/09/2024 bearing common reference No.CTO(A)-5/MNG/GST/INS-1/2024-25 in Form GST DRC-22 issued to attach the SB A/c.No.23531 at Canara Bank in the case of the petitioner and enclosed as Annexure B1.

b. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Order under 83 of KGST/CGST Act, 2017 passed by the Respondent No.1 on 27/09/2024 bearing common reference No.CTO(A)-5/MNG/GST/INS-1/2024-25 in Form GST DRC-22 issued to attach the SB A/c.No. 4712500101313501 at Karnataka Bank in the case of the petitioner and enclosed as Annexure B2.

c. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Order under 83 of KGST/CGST Act, 2017 passed by the Respondent No.1 on 27/09/2024 bearing common reference No.CTO(A)-5/MNG/GST/INS-1/2024-25 in Form GST DRC-22 issued to attach the SB A/c.No. 520101000343257 at Union Bank in the case of the petitioner and enclosed as Annexure B3.

d. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Order under 83 of KGST/CGST Act, 2017 passed by the Respondent No.1 on 27/09/2024 bearing common reference No.CTO(A)-5/MNG/GST/INS-1/2024-25 in Form GST DRC-22 issued to attach the O/D A/c.No. 0880285000016 at Canara Bank in the case of the petitioner and enclosed as Annexure B4.

e. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Order under 83 of KGST/CGST Act, 2017 passed by the Respondent No.1 on 27/09/2024 & on 05/10/2024 bearing common reference No.CTO(A)-5/MNG/GST/INS 1/2024-25 in Form GST DRC-22 issued to attach the properties of the petitioner which is situated at Municiple City Corporation Limits and enclosed as Annexure B5 and B6 respectively.

f. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Order under 83 of KGST/CGST Act, 2017 passed by the Respondent No.1 on 09/10/2024 bearing common reference No.CTO(A)-5/MNG/GST/INS-1/2024-25 in Form GST DRC-22 issued to attach the properties situated at Municiple City Corporation Limits and also at Casba Bazar Village, Kudroli, Mangalore enclosed as Annexure B7.

g. Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in this matter including but not limited to costs of this petition."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the respondent has passed the impugned order dated 27.09.2024 by invoking Section 83 of the CGST/KGST Act, 2017 , which reads as under:

" Section 83 . Provisional attachment to protect revenue in certain cases.

1[(1) Where, after the initiation of any proceeding under Chapter XII, Chapter XIV or Chapter XV, the Commissioner is of the opinion that for the purpose of protecting the interest of the Government revenue it is necessary so to do, he may, by order in writing, attach provisionally, any property, including bank account, belonging to the taxable person or any person specified in s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top