Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
RADHAMMA W/O JAYANNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA HOME DEPARTMENT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks parole for son. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details on parole regulations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. objectives and procedures of parole. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. need for clearer reporting requirements. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. assessment of risk when granting parole. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. issues with indecisive parole applications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. recommendation for electronic processing of parole. (Para 16) |
| 8. court ordered parole grant with conditions. (Para 17) |
CAV ORDER
1. The Petitioner who is the mother of the convict-Srinivasa CTP-04140 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
i. Direct the Respondent No.2 to release the petitioner’s son Srinivasa CTP-01440 on general parole for a period of 30 days with liberty to seek extension to enable him to supervise and complete the renovation of the current residence which is presently in a dilapidated condition.
ii. Pass any other order(s) which this court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.
2. The convict who is sentenced for imprisonment of ten years for the offences punishable under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 (2)(6) of the IPC in Spl.C.(P).No.2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
