IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.315 OF 2024 (IO)

BETWEEN:

1. SAROJ FERNANDEZ W/O RONALD FERNANDEZ, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 2. JENNIFER FERNANDEZ S/O LATE RONALD FERNANDEZ, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

3. VINCENT FERNANDEZ S/O LATE RONALD FERNANDEZ, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO.15, OLD NO.13, 1^ST CROSS, SUBEDARPALYA, YESHWANTHAPURA, BENGALURU-560 022 Digitally signed by …PETITIONERS MALATE SH (BY SRI CHANDRASHEKAR H B, ADVOCATE -ABSENT)

K C Location: AND:

HIGH COURT OF

1. SRI. MARQUESSFERNANDEZ KARNATAKA S/O LATE M FERNANDEZ, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT NO.497, MODEL COLONY, 2^ND CROSS, YESHWANTHAPURA, BENGALURU-560 022

2. SMT DOROTHY SOLOMON D/O LATE M FERNANDEZ, W/O JOSEPH SOLOMON, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, NO.534, NISAR ALIKA BAGICHA, NAPIER TOWN, JABALPUR-482 001

3. SMT MOLLY D’ SOUZA D/O LATE M FERNANDEZ, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, R/AT NO.308/A, G M VILLA, ALVARIS ROAD, NEAR KHADRI MARKET, KHADRI POST, MANGALORE-575 002

4. SMT FLOSSY D SOUZA D/O LATE M FERNANDEZ, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT NO.727/36, 1^ST MAIN, 1^ST CROSS, VYALIKAVAL, MALLESHWARAM POST, BENGALURU-560 003

5. SMT JULIAN RODRIGUES D/O LATE M FERNANDEZ, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT VIRJOE DOMAINE, ALVARIS ROAD, KHADRI, MANGALORE-575002 …RESPONDENTS (VIDE ORDER DATED 09.02.2021, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R1 IS HELD SUFFICIENT;

VIDE ORDER DATED 17.03.2020, NOTICE TO R2 TO R5 IS DISPENSED WITH)

THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 7.08.2019 PASSED ON IA IN OS NO.7201/2010 ON THE FILE OF XV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE IA FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE

11(d) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

None appears for the revision petitioners. Revision Petition is of the year 2024.

2. Even on the last date, there was no representation. Order sheet discloses that the revision petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting the revision petition.

3. In the interest of justice, this Court granted last opportunity to today from previous date.

4. Taking note of the fact that the revision petitioners failed to appear today also, revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

(V SRISHANANDA)

JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22