THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
M/S THARU AND SONS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 31625 OF 2025 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
M/S THARU AND SONS
2ND FLOOR, KALAMASSERY NEAR METRO PILLAR NO.250 KALAMASSERY PO EMAKULAM DISTRICT KERALA -683104 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHRI ANTONY THARU …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BAPAT SAMPATH VINAYAKA RAO.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGAER SOUTH WETSREN RAILWAY RAIL SADAN, GADAG ROAD HUBBALLI 20 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVEND RA 2. SENIOR DVISIONAL MECHANNICAL ENGINEER Location: HIGH SOUTH WESTER RAILWAY COURT OF
18 MILLERS ROAD KARNATAKA BENGALURU 46
3. M/S LEOTECH PROCESS NO.10-26 RAMALAYAM STREET ENIKEPADU, VIJAYAWADA 520008 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A. CHANDRA CHUD., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
V/O/D 17.10.2025 NOTICE TO R3 IS D/W)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE ANY APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION MORE PARTICULARLY A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DECLARING THAT THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE FURNISHED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DOES NOT MEET THE TECHNICAL ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA PR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.