SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39697

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
M/S THARU AND SONS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 31625 OF 2025 (GM-TEN)

BETWEEN:

M/S THARU AND SONS

2ND FLOOR, KALAMASSERY NEAR METRO PILLAR NO.250 KALAMASSERY PO EMAKULAM DISTRICT KERALA -683104 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHRI ANTONY THARU …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BAPAT SAMPATH VINAYAKA RAO.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGAER SOUTH WETSREN RAILWAY RAIL SADAN, GADAG ROAD HUBBALLI 20 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVEND RA 2. SENIOR DVISIONAL MECHANNICAL ENGINEER Location: HIGH SOUTH WESTER RAILWAY COURT OF

18 MILLERS ROAD KARNATAKA BENGALURU 46

3. M/S LEOTECH PROCESS NO.10-26 RAMALAYAM STREET ENIKEPADU, VIJAYAWADA 520008 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A. CHANDRA CHUD., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;

V/O/D 17.10.2025 NOTICE TO R3 IS D/W)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE ANY APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION MORE PARTICULARLY A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DECLARING THAT THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE FURNISHED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DOES NOT MEET THE TECHNICAL ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA PR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top