SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39711

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
SRI M V SESHAN – Appellant
Versus
SRI HARSHA MURTHY – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

Heard Sri Harshita Suresh, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri Ramesh Kumar for Sri P.N.Narayana Swamy, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and Sri Vinod Reddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 6.

2. Second defendant in O.S No.124/2024 is the revision petitioner challenging the rejection of I.A.No.2 filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

3. Facts in the nutshell which are utmost necessary for the disposal of the present revision petition are as under:

4. First respondent filed a suit in O.S No.124/2024 for partition and separation of the following properties hereinafter referred to as the ‘suit properties’.

“A" SCHEDULE PROPERTIES

Item No.1

All the piece and parcel of the Land bearing Sy.No.468 measuring 2 acre 37 guntas situated at Mulabagal Village, Kasaba Hobli, Mulabagal Taluk, Kolar District and bounded on the;

East by: Land of Rajanna

West by: Land of Lakshmidevamma

North by : Land of Rajanna

South by : Land of Srinivas

Item No.2:

All the piece and parcel of the Land bearing Sy.No.507/1 measuring 1 acre 4.08 guntas situated at Mulabagal Village, Kasaba Hobli, Mulabagal Taluk, Kolar District and bounded on the ;

East by : Land

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top