THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
SRI M V SESHAN – Appellant
Versus
SRI HARSHA MURTHY – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri Harshita Suresh, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri Ramesh Kumar for Sri P.N.Narayana Swamy, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and Sri Vinod Reddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 6.
2. Second defendant in O.S No.124/2024 is the revision petitioner challenging the rejection of I.A.No.2 filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
3. Facts in the nutshell which are utmost necessary for the disposal of the present revision petition are as under:
4. First respondent filed a suit in O.S No.124/2024 for partition and separation of the following properties hereinafter referred to as the ‘suit properties’.
“A" SCHEDULE PROPERTIES
Item No.1
All the piece and parcel of the Land bearing Sy.No.468 measuring 2 acre 37 guntas situated at Mulabagal Village, Kasaba Hobli, Mulabagal Taluk, Kolar District and bounded on the;
East by: Land of Rajanna
West by: Land of Lakshmidevamma
North by : Land of Rajanna
South by : Land of Srinivas
Item No.2:
All the piece and parcel of the Land bearing Sy.No.507/1 measuring 1 acre 4.08 guntas situated at Mulabagal Village, Kasaba Hobli, Mulabagal Taluk, Kolar District and bounded on the ;
East by : Land
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.