Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. R. NATARAJ, J
SRI. SELVARAJ V. – Appellant
Versus
SRI. G. MUNIVENKATAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of ownership and possession. (Para 3) |
| 2. defendants contest the plaintiff’s ownership. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments on necessity of title declaration. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. clarification on need for title declaration. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. conclusion to allow appeal and decree in favor of plaintiff. (Para 18) |
| 6. final order after appeal. (Para 19) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall henceforth be referred to as they were arrayed before the Trial Court. The appellant was the plaintiff and the respondents were the defendants before the Trial Court.
(ii) The plaintiff claimed that he received an electricity bill dated 26.08.2006 that was issued in the name of defendant No.1. This generated suspicion in the mind of the plaintiff and after making enquiry, he came to know that defendant Nos.1 and 2 had conspired and had brought about a sale deed registered in the name of defendant No.1 by giving different khata. The plaintiff also made enquiry in the Office of the Sub- Registrar and came to know that the sale deed dated 03.04.2006 was executed by the defendant No.2 in favour of defendant No.1. The plaintiff thereafter obtained a copy of the sale deed and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
