SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39778

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
SRI R PARVATAPPA – Appellant
Versus
MR N C CHANNABASAPPA – Respondent


CAV JUDGMENT

These appeals arise from divergent findings in a suit for declaration, rectification of records, injunction and for possession.

The plaintiff sought a declaration that the plaintiff, along with defendant No.8, is the joint owner and is in possession of the suit property, and defendants No.1 to 7 have no manner of right, title or possession in the suit property.

2. The plaintiff also sought rectification of M.R. No.26/1990-91 and M.R.No.27/1990-91 dated 30.08.1991, and sought a direction to restore the names of the plaintiff and defendant No.8 in the property records.

3. The plaintiff further sought possession of a farmhouse built by defendant No.7. In addition, the plaintiff sought a permanent injunction and damages at the rate of ₹50/- per month for use and occupation of the farmhouse till the delivery of possession.

4. The description of the suit property provided by the plaintiff reads as under:-

Land situated at Neralkere Village, Amruthapura Hobli, Tarikere Taluk, bearing Survey No.190/4 measuring 3 acres 11 guntas, including a Farm House in the North Eastern corner of the land measuring 60x30 feet. The boundaries of the Survey No.190/4, measuring 3 acres 11 guntas, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top