Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MRS. K.S. HEMALEKHA, J
JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE MUNIYELLAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of land acquisition and relevant notifications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. legal challenges and court orders regarding land acquisition. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented by petitioners and respondents. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's reasoning on the applicability of previous judgments. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the material on record.
4. It further appears that certain land owners challenged the preliminary notification and final notification dated 17.11.1988 and 19.11.1989 before this Court in the case of Shaikh Basheer and others -vs- State represented by its Commissioners and others
For the reasons stated above, I pass the following order:-
However, liberty is reserved to the BDA to proceed with the acquisition in accordance with law and such acquisition shall be completed within one year from today. If the petitioners have not filed any objections, they are permitted to do so within a year period of one month from today, without awaiting any notice from th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
