SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 39864

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
MR. ARUN KUMAR G V – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


CAV ORDER

In this petition, petitioner – accused seeks quashing of the impugned FIR in Crime No.41/2024 registered on 14.11.2024 by the 1st respondent – Lokayuktha police, pursuant to a complaint dated 14.11.2024 filed by the 2nd respondent – complainant against the petitioner for offences punishable under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of the Corruption Act, 1988 (for short ‘the P.C.Act’) and for other reliefs.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the 1st respondent and perused the material on record.

3. Though the notice of this petition has been served on the 2nd respondent, he has chosen to remain absent and unrepresented and not contested the petition.

4. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the petitioner is working as an Inspector in the Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force (BMTF) as an employee of the BBMP. The 2nd respondent filed a complaint dated 14.11.2024 with the 1st respondent – Lokayuktha interalia stating that he was the husband of Smt.Sridevi, who was the owner of the land bearing Sy.No.56 of Kumbena Agrahara Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore and had entered into a JDA with M/s.S.S Developers, who

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top