SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40170

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K.MANMADHA RAO
MINOR DEEPSHIKA – Appellant
Versus
K NAGARAJA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF OCTOBER , 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3603 OF 2015(MV-I)

BETWEEN:

MINOR DEEPSHIKA AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, D/O LOKESH BHANDARY, R/O C/O SUNGANDHI, JATHA BETTU, UPPOOR POST AND VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT-576 101.

SINCE APPELLANT IS MINOR SHI IS REP: BY MOTHER GUARDIAN-KAVYA …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NAGARAJ HEGDE, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. K NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O VENKATARAMANA SHERIGARA, R/O H.NO. 11/128, INDIRANAGARA, POST: KATBELTHUR, HEMMADI VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576 201.

2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SRI RAM ARCADE, OPP: H.P.O., UDUPI-576 101, REP: BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.KRISHNA KISHORE, ADVOCATE FOR R-2;

R-1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 26.11.2014 PASSED BY THE COURT OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT, UDUPI, IN M.V.C.NO.877/2013 TO THE EXTENT OF DISALLOWED CLAIM AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON 09.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top