SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40178

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
M/S N D WADDAR AND CO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


CAV ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question Government Order dated 25-08-2023 and seeks a consequent direction to consider its representations all dated 21-11-2023 for release of funds.

2. Heard Sri Bipin Hegde, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri K.Shashikiran Shetty, learned Advocate General appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri M.R.C. Ravi, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.2.

3. Facts, in brief, germane, are as follows: -

3.1. The petitioner is said to be a registered partnership firm, registered as PWD Class-I Contractor and empanelled as Category-I contractor under the Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Niyamitha (hereinafter referred as ‘the Corporation’ for short) and is claiming to be having expertise in execution of irrigation works like construction of canals, extension, renovation and modernization of canal works and all works incidental thereto. The 2nd respondent notifies a tender for the work of extension, renovation and modernization of distributaries from 1 to 15 and its laterals including structures of Narayanpur right bank canal system (Package-I). Pursuant to the process of assessment of tender, a letter of acceptance was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top