IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT APPEAL NO. 412 OF 2023 (L-PG)

BETWEEN:

1. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HR/ADMN)

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER TELEPHONE HOUSE, RAJBHAVAN ROAD BENGALURU 560001.

2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HR/FINANCE)

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER TELEPHONE HOUSE, RAJBHAVAN ROAD BENGALURU 560001.

…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. Y HARIPRASAD., ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by RUPA V 1. SMT. CHANDRAMATHI Location: W/O H V RAMACHANDRA High Court AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS Of Karnataka R/AT NO 98, 3RD MAIN

3RD CROSS, VINAYAKA LAYOUT ABBIGERE, BENGALURU 560090.

2. THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT AND ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL)

'SHRAM SADAN' III CROSS, III MAIN II PHASE, TUMAKURU ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR, BENGALURU 560022.

3. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT AND ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL)

'SHRAM SADAN' III CROSS III MAIN, II PHASE TUMAKURU ROAD, YESHWANTHPUR BENGALURU 560022.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANANDARAMA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1;

SRI. MADANAN PILLAI R., CGC FOR R2 & R3)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 28-07-2022 PASSED IN W.P No. 32210/2017 (L-PG) IN SO FAR AS GRANTING THE 10 PERCENT INTEREST PER ANNUM ON THE DEDUCTED AMOUNT OF Rs.1,84,778/- FROM 01-09-2013 i.e., THE DATE OF RETIREMENT OF THE PETITIONER WITHIN A PERIOD OF 8 WEEKS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THE COPY OF THIS ORDER, FAILING WHICH THE RESPONDENTS WOULD BE LIABLE TO MAKE PAYMENT AT THE RATE OF 15 PERCENT PER ANNUM UNTIL PAYMENT AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

This appeal is filed challenging the order dated

28.07.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.32210/2017 (L-PG) insofar as granting of 10% interest per annum on the amount of Rs.1,84,778/- which had been withheld from the respondent No.1/writ petitioner's gratuity. Interest at 10% per annum was directed to be paid from 01.09.2013 i.e., the date of retirement of the respondent No.1/writ petitioner.

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1/petitioner and the learned Central Government Counsel for respondents No.2 & 3.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the principal amount of gratuity has already been paid and the appeal is filed only with regard to the interest.

4. We notice that the interest under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, (for short, 'the Act') is statutory in nature and that there is no power in this Court to waive such interest. We also notice that Section 7(3A) of the Act specifically provides as under:

"7. Determination of the amount of gratuity.

(1) xxx (2) xxx (3) xxx (3A) If the amount of gratuity payable under sub- section (3) is not paid by the employer within the period specified in sub-section (3), the employer shall pay, from the date on which the gratuity becomes payable to the date on which it is paid, simple interest at such rate, not exceeding the rate notified by the Central Government from time to time for repayment of long-term deposits, as that Government may, by notification specify:

Provided that no such interest shall be payable if the delay in the payment is due to the fault of the employee and the employer has obtained permission in writing from the controlling authority for the delayed payment on this ground.]"

5. In the instant case, there is no contention that the delay in payment of gratuity was on account of any fault of the employee. Therefore, the respondent No.1 herein would be entitled, statutorily to the interest notified by the Cen