SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40296

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ASHOK S.KINAGI
SMT. MANGALA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. B. SIDDAIAH – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

1. This Regular Second Appeal is filed by the appellants challenging the judgment and decree dated 21.01.2013 passed in R.A.No.232 of 2011 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-V, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore reversing the judgment and decree dated 01.07.2011 passed in O.S.No.68 of 2009 by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Nelamangala.

2. For convenience, the parties are referred to, based on their rankings before the trial Court. The appellants were the plaintiffs, and the respondents were the defendants.

3. Brief facts, leading rise to the filing of this appeal are as follows:

4. The plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendants for a relief of declaration and permanent injunction. It is the case of the plaintiffs that, the land bearing Survey No.199/1 measuring 39 guntas with a residential house measuring east-west 45 feet; north-south 35 feet and a foundation laid to an extent of portion measuring east-west 45 feet; north-south 35 feet; situated at Nelamangala, and a portion measuring 10 guntas in Survey No. 199/1 situated at Nelamangala, which are described as suit A schedule and suit B schedule properties. It is conte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top