SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40308

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANU SIVARAMAN AND VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
SRI B P MUKUNDA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SRI B P BABU REDDY – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 73 OF 2020 (PAR/POS)

BETWEEN:

SRI B P MUKUNDA REDDY S/O LATE PAPANNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.187, 8TH CROSS BELLANDUR VILLAGE AND POST BENGALURU-560 103.

…APPELLANT (BY SRI. G. V. SHASHI KUMAR., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SRI B P BABU REDDY S/O LATE PAPANNA REDDY Digitally AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS signed by RUPA V Location: 2. SMT. GANGOJAMMA @ GAYATHRI High Court W/O B P BABU REDDY Of Karnataka AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.9, GROUND FLOOR SRINIVASA DIAMOND APARTMENTS BELLANDUR MAIN ROAD BELLANDUR VILLAGE AND POST BENGALURU-560 103.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVASHANKAR S. K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE

1 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.09.2013 PASSED IN OS.NO.7383/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C I ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION, SEPARATE POSSESSION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top