Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. V SRISHANANDA, J
SRI RANGASWAMY N.M. – Appellant
Versus
SRI.D.K.SRINIVAS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant's obligations regarding rent and termination. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. defendant's claims against landlord's assertions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. submission and examination of evidence in court. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 4. assessment of lease agreements and tenant evictions. (Para 18 , 24 , 29 , 31) |
| 5. final order for eviction and conclusion of the case. (Para 32 , 33) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri Devaraj A.S., learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri Ramesha M.N., learned counsel for respondent.
2. Defendant in S.C.No.1765/2018 is the revision petitioner, challenging the decree of ejectment passed in the said small causes suit.
3. Operative portion of the order of the trial Court reads as under:
“The Suit of the Plaintiff is partly decreed with costs.
The defendant is hereby directed to quit, vacate and deliver vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the plaintiff within two months from the date of this order.
Further the defendant is directed to pay arrears of rent of Rs.55,000/- and enhanced rent from July 2018 onwards and further directed to pay damages.
In the event of failure of the defendant to deliver the vacant possession of schedule proper
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
