Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
OWUSU COLLINUS GHANIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail petition filed under ndps act. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding grounds of arrest. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes the credibility of the prosecution case. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. legal requirement of informing grounds of arrest. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. judicial interpretation on communication of arrest grounds. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. procedural compliance in informing grounds of arrest. (Para 18 , 22) |
| 7. high bar for granting bail under ndps act. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 8. petition dismissed; bail not granted. (Para 24) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent.
(i) Pankaj Bhansal vs. Union of India (2023 INSC 866)
(iii) Vihaan Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2025 INSC 162)
(v) Ashish Kakkar vs. UT of Chandigarh (Crl.A.1518/2025)
4. Learned counsel for respondent would contend that grounds of arrest have been intimated to the accused at the time of arrest. Even though the grounds are in Kannada, the same have been explained in English and the petitioner has affixed his signature and LTM on the same. Even the arrest of the petitioner has been communicated to his friend who has also affixed his signature on arrest report dated 01.05.2025. The contraband has b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
