Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
OWUSU COLLINUS GHANIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail petition filed under ndps act. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding grounds of arrest. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes the credibility of the prosecution case. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. legal requirement of informing grounds of arrest. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. judicial interpretation on communication of arrest grounds. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. procedural compliance in informing grounds of arrest. (Para 18 , 22) |
| 7. high bar for granting bail under ndps act. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 8. petition dismissed; bail not granted. (Para 24) |
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed by accused No.1 under Section 483 of BNSS praying to grant bail in Crime No.109/2025 of Kothanuru Police Station registered for the offence punishable under Section 22 (c), 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’) and Section 14 of Foreigners Act .
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is having Passport and Visa and it was valid as on the date of alleged offence and therefore, offence under Section 14 of Foreigners Act is not attracted. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is seeking bai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
