SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2995

2025 KHC 42897
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Vinayak Badiger S/o Dundappa – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka State Law University, Hubli – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 25979 of 2025
Decided On : 28-10-2025
Advocates Appeared : 
For the Appellant : Shivananda D.S.
For the Respondents : Girish Kumar, Balaji N.

Eligibility for admission to three-year LL.B. course includes I.T.I qualifications, challenging prior restrictions based on past interpretations of educational norms.

Headnote:(A) Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 5 - Eligibility for admission to three year LL.B. Degree Course - University must accept I.T.I course as equivalent to Pre-University qualification, contrary to past practices - Previous cases established precedent for eligibility of varying qualifications - Petitioner denied admission due to I.T.I qualification, challenged in writ petition. (Paras 4, 8, and 19)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - The court exercised jurisdiction to quash the denial of admission based on flawed reasoning, affirming that a degree conferred suffices for law course eligibility - Court reiterates that I.T.I cannot be dismissed as an inadequate qualification for entry into LL.B. (Paras 3, 18)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought admission to LL.B. asserting that his I.T.I course should be considered equivalent to Pre-University education, having previously completed a B.Com degree which the University accepted for his admission to law school.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the University erred in not considering the I.T.I as valid for eligibility, directing immediate admission based on prescribed rules.

Issues: The critical issue pertains to whether an I.T.I qualification is sufficient for eligibility for the three-year law degree course as defined under existing educational regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that regulations did not explicitly exclude I.T.I courses as valid qualifications, thus compelling the University to recognize them in the admissions process.

Result: Petition allowed; University directed to admit the petitioner to LL.B. course and issue eligibility certificate.

ORDER :

1. In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

“(a) Issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to take admission to the 2nd year of 3 years LLB Course for the academic year 2025-26 by issue of any other writ, order, direction as the case may be.

(b) Issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the requisition dated 11.08.2025 vide Annexure-W and issue eligibility certificate.

(c) Pass any such other order/s as this Hon’ble Court deemed fit under the circumstances of the case.”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record would indicate that the issue in controversy involved in the present petition is directly and squarely covered by the judgments of this Court in the cases of Sri Naveenkumar K.V. Vs. The Karnataka State Law University and Ors. W.P. No. 26757/2024 dated 01.10.2024 and Rakesh Shetty Vs. The State of Karnataka and Ors. W.P. No. 31737/2024 dated 09.12.2024.

4. In Sri. Naveenkumar K.V.’s case, (supra), this Court has held as under:

In this petition, petitioner seeks the following relief:

i) Issue a Writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned endorsement bearing Application ref No.LW002S240001257 dated 21.09.2024 issued by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-R and consequently, direct the respondent No.1 to issue eligibility certificate in favour of petitioner by considering his qualification for admission to Three Year Law Degree Course in any of the Recognized colleges of the 1st respondent, in the interest of justice and equity.

ii) Grant such other reliefs as may be deems to be fit to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for respondent No.1 and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record would indicate that issue in controversy involved in the present petition is directly and squarely covered by the judgments of this Court in the cases of Abubakar Vs. Karnataka State Law University and others, W.P. No. 200642/2021 dated 08.12.2021 and N. Dinesh Vs. The Karnataka State Law University, W.P. No. 15723 of 2023 dated 22.08.2023.

4. In Abubakar's case (supra), this Court has held as under:

"The petitioner has completed his SSLC in the academic year 2009-10 from Urdu High School, Jewargi, District Kalaburagi. Thereafter, he has completed I.T.I (Electrician), a two years course from Shri Noorandeshwar I.T.I, Jewargi in the year 2012. Thereafter, he has passed three years B.A. Degree in the year 2020 from Gulbarga University, Kalaburagi. Thereafter, he has approached respondent No.2 for admission to three years LL.B course. The same has been rejected by respondent No.2 on the ground that the petitioner has not passed 10+2+3 as contemplated under the law. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition.

2. The contention of the respondents is that the petitioner ought to have passed Pre-university after passing 10th standard and thereafter should have completed his Degree and then only he would be eligible for admission to LL.B. But, the petitioner has completed a I.T.I course for two years and hence he is not being considered for admission to LL.B.

3. Rule 2(vi) of the Rules of Legal Education framed by the Bar Council of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’) defines ‘Bachelor degree in law’ as under:

“2(vi) “Bachelor degree in law” means and includes a degree in law conferred by the University recognized by the Bar Council of India for the purpose of the Act and includes a bachelor degree in law after any bachelor degree in science, arts, commerce, engineering, medicine, or any other discipline of a University for a period of study not less than three years or an integrated bachelor degree combining the course of a first bachelor degree in any subject and also the law running

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top