SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 40655

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ANIL KUMAR K N – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 21623/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 21623 OF 2025 (EDN-RES)

BETWEEN:

ANIL KUMAR K. N. S/O NAGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDING AT KODENAKOPPALU VILLAGE, KIRUGAVALU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 424 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJU BYRAL R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VIDHAN SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001 Digitally signed by CHANDANA

2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC B M INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT Location: High MYSORE DISTRICT, Court of Karnataka MYSORE – 570 005

3. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTURCTION, KARNATAKA HIGHER EDUCATION BOARD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 003

4. BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER T NARASIPURA ZONE T NARASIPURA – 571 124

5. SECRETARY STATE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION COUNCIL KOWSALYA BHAVAN, NEAR DAIRY CIRCLE BANNERUGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU – 560 029

6. HEAD MASTER GOVERNMENT PRIMARY HIGH SCHOOL DODDAMULAGUDDU T NARASIPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 124

7. HEAD MASTER GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL DODDAMULAGUDDU T NARASIPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 124

8. PRINCIPAL GNANASINDU INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE MANDYA – 571 401 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K. HCGP)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.10.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND REPRESENTATION DATED 25.03.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-H IN VIEW OF THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN I.S.NO.159/2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALAVALLI DATED 02.08.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND TO PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-

“a. Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other Order or Direction directing the Respondents to consider the representation dated 22.10.2024 vide Annexure-D and representation dated 25.03.2025 vide Annexure- H, in view of the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.159/2023 passed by the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Malavalli dated 02.08.2024 as per Annexure-C and to pass appropriate order.

b. Pass any such other further Orders as this Hon’ble Court deems as fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, to meet the ends of justice.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the judgment of this Court in the case of Miss. Bhavani Umanand Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and others – W.P.No.12869/2022 dated 20.09.2023, in order to contend that the issue in controversy in the present petition is covered by the aforesaid judgment and the present petition may be disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

4. The said submission is placed on record.

5. Learned HCGP would oppose the said submission and submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

6. This Court, in the case of Miss. Bhavani Umanand Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and others –

W.P.No.12869/2022 dated 20.09.2023, has held as under:

“In this petition, the petitioner has sought for the following relief:

“ To issue a writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.1 and 2 to correct the date of birth of the petitioner in Grade X marks card - Roll No.4063323 at Annexure- D as 24.12.2003 instead of 24.08.2003 by considering the application submitted by the 3rd respondent along covering letter dated 17.06.2020 vide Annexure-G and issue corrected marks card to the petitioner”.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. Respondent No.3-School having been served with notice of the petition has chosen to remain absent. There is no representation and has not contested the petition.

4. The material on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top