Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.I.ARUN, J
MR. THAMMEGOWDA S/O SANNAPPAGOWDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY K.R.PET RURAL POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations revolve around property dispute as the core issue. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. the fir is quashed due to lack of evidence. (Para 8 , 14) |
| 3. no legal basis proven for the alleged offences. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORAL ORDER
The criminal petition is filed with the following prayers:
"a) Call For Records in Crime No 144/2023 on the file of V Addl Cistrict And Session Court Mandya,
b) Quash the FIR in Crime No 144/2023 registered for an offence punishable under section 447, 504, 506, 323, 34 of IPC and u/s- 3(1)(f),3(1)(R), 3(1)(s) of SC & ST (Prevention of the Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015 registered by the K.R.Pet Rural police (Respondent No1) before V Addl District And Session Court Mandya and,
c) Grant any other relief that this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. There is a civil dispute between the petitioners and respondent No.2/complainant by way of O.S.No.400/2016, pending on the file of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Krishnarajapete, wherein respondent No.2 is the plaintiff No.1. The same is in respect of a property and respondent No.2 has preferred a suit for permanent injunction.
3. The allegation of respondent No.2 aga
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
