THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SHRI.RAJANNA P – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OFKARNATAKA – Respondent
CAV ORDER
Both these petitions, call in question, the notification issued by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Board’ for short) under Sections 28(1) and 28(4) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’ for short), insofar as the land of these petitioners, as described in the respective petitions.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for petitioner Sri Murali Babu M., in W.P.No.10575 of 2025 and Sri Chandan Gowda Patil in W.P.No.8678 of 2025; Smt Rashmi Rao, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the State and Sri B B Patil, learned counsel appearing for respondents/KIADB.
3. The petitioners claim to be the owners in possession of lands in Sy.Nos.67 and 52/1 respectively of Byradenahalli village, Kundana Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District as observed hereinabove. The lands that have come to the hands of the petitioners have been narrated in the petition, which would not be necessary for consideration of the issue in the lis. The lands in Sy.Nos.67 and 52/1 of Byradenahalli village, Kundana Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk Bangalore Rural District becomes the subjec



Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.