CAV JUDGMENT

This second appeal is filed challenging the concurrent finding of the Trial Court passed in O.S.No.270/2007 dated 17.02.2014 granting the relief of declaration and injunction and confirming the judgment and decree of the Trial Court by the First Appellate Court in R.A.No.28/2014 dated 23.12.2021. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants. The counsel for the respondent did not choose to address the arguments inspite of opportunity is given.

3. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court while seeking the relief of declaration and permanent detention is that suit schedule land bearing Sy.No.1 measuring 20 guntas which is morefully described in the schedule is granted to plaintiff on 06.03.2004. It is contented that plaintiff had changed the katha in his name and the survey authority also prepared the survey sketch. From the date of grant, the plaintiff is in possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The defendant has no manner of title, right and possession over the suit schedule property. When the plaintiff was installing the pump set, the defendant obstructed with an intention to cause trouble to the plaintiff by denying t