ORAL JUDGMENT

The appeal is filed by the appellants/defendant Nos. 6 to 9 questioning the order dated 04.04.2025 passed on I.A.Nos. I, II and V filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of CPC in O.S.No.1824/2024 by the XXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-40), whereby the application filed for temporary injunction was allowed in part.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties in this appeal are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants No.1 and 2, their agents, henchmen, successors, General Power of Attorney holders, nominee/s and others on their behalf from trespassing on the suit schedule property and restraining all the defendants and their men from creating encumbrances of any nature in the suit schedule property.

4. The plaintiffs have filed the suit with allegations that the suit schedule property is originally belonged to one late Sri.B.S Siddaramappa, who was the owner, executed a registered Will dated 22.07.1983 in favour of his daughter-in-law by name Smt. Sharadamma wife of S. Srinivas and bequeathed the said suit schedule property. Smt