SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41128

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SMT JYOTI W/O SHRIDHAR KAMBLE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an endorsement dated 22-04-2025, issued by the 2nd respondent by which the claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds is said to have been turned down.

2. Heard Smt. Sanjana S.Mudhol, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. Kirtilata R. Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Sri Prasad R.Sidhanti, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.6 and 7.

3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows: -The petitioner is the wife of one Shridhar Kamble, who was working as an Assistant Teacher in Hindi subject, a permanent employee in the 7th respondent-Management, an aided Institution. The husband of the petitioner died in harness while serving as an Assistant Teacher, on 07-04-2012. On 01-02-2013 before completion of one year from the date of the death of her husband, the petitioner submits an application seeking appointment on compassionate grounds. The application of the petitioner was forwarded to the competent authority for consideration. No consideration happens immediately. The petitioner then had to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top