THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.G.PANDIT AND GEETHA K.B.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
KASTURI WIFE OF RAMANGOUDA – Respondent
WA 100641/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
WRIT APPEAL NO. 100641 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD 580007. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD, SUB DIVISION, DHARWAD 580007.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUKA. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD 580007.
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001.
…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA)
AND:
VISHAL DsVNP i A I ig IS g NT ni H T te G a Ad IA l H Lb P y A y PLA 1. KASTURI W/O RAMANGOUDA HONNAPPANAVAR N PA IN TT G I A H P A P L ALHCKDB o E AO H IcG N RU A aH N CR t R i A H o W T n T O A : AD FKA AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, 2. RUDRASARJA @ RUDRAGOUDA S/O RAMANGOUDA HONNAPPANAVAR AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 3. SHANKAR @ SHANKARGOUDA S/O RAMANGOUDA HONNAPPANAVR AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, ALL ARE R/O MARIHAL, TQ. BAILHONGAL, DIST. BELAGAVI 591102.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOUBHAGYA S. VAKKUND, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.101033/2024 DATED
12.06.2024 AND DISMISSED WRIT PETITION & ETC.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT)
This writ appeal filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 by the respondents before the learned Single Judge, is directed against order dated 12.06.2024 in WP No.101033/2024, whereunder the learned Single Judge passed the following order:
i) The petition is allowed.
ii) The writ of mandamus is issued to respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 25.07.2023 and enter the names of the petitioners in the record of rights based on the registered sale deed with respect to RS No.163(1) the same shall be done within an outer limit of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.
2. Heard the learned AGA for the appellants/State Authorities and learned counsel Smt. Soubhagya Vakkund for the respondents. Perused the entire writ appeal papers.
3. The State Authorities are in appeal against the direction of the learned Single Judge directing the appellants to consider the representation dated 25.07.2023 and enter the name of the petitioners in the RTC based on the registered sale deed with respect to RS No.163/1, only on the ground that the proceedings under Form-7A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 is pending before the Land Tribunal. On the said ground, the authorities cannot refuse to enter the name of the purchaser. However, it is made clear that entering the name of the petitioners in the RTC in respect of land in RS No.163/1 would be subject to outcome of the proceedings pending before the Land Tribunal in Form-7A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.
4. With the above observation, the writ appeal stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(S G PANDIT)
Sd/-
(GEETHA K.B.)
JTR, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 24
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.