SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41316

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
G GUNNESHWARA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the issue in the present petition stand covered by the judgment rendered by this Court on 16.02.2022 in Crl.P.No.101739 of 2021 and connected matters.

2. Learned AGA on verification of the said judgment and on instructions would submit that the issue indeed is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court. This Court in the aforesaid judgment held as follows:

“For the sake of convenience, facts in brief in Criminal Petition No. 101739 of 2021 are narrated. The petitioner in the said criminal petition is an independent trader dealing with stock and distribution of food grains and claims to be in possession of a license to carry out such trade. Claiming to be on credible information, the Police Sub-Inspector of Navanagar Police Station intercepted a Baloro vehicle on an alleged complaint that the vehicle was transporting rice bags and conducted a search on the vehicle. The complainant also accompanied the Police Sub-Inspector, who conducted search or raid on the permission allegedly granted by his superior Officer. The complainant and the Police staff-panchas go to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top