SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41320

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
YAMANAPPA S/O NINGABASAPPA AMBIGER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. The petitioner’s mother-in-law and father-in-law are before this Court calling in question the proceedings in C.C.No.577/2023 instituted against them for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel Sri.V.P.Vadavi for the petitioners, learned AGA Sri.T.Hanumareddy for the respondent- State and the learned counsel Sri.Neelendra D.Gunde appearing for respondent No.2.

3. Facts in brief germane are as follows:

The 2nd respondent is the complainant, wife of accused No.1, who is not before this Court. The petitioners are accused Nos.2 and 3, the mother-in-law and father-in-law. The marriage of the accused No.1 and the complainant, 2nd respondent takes place on 03.05.2021 and the relationship between the two appears to have floundered and floundering of the relationship, wife instituted several proceedings one such proceeding is the registration of a crime in Crime No.4/2023 for the afore-quoted offences against the accused, husband and several other members of the family. The police conduct investigation and dropped the others and filed a charge sheet against the mother- in-law, fathe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top