SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41336

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
VENKATESH NAIK T
SHRI. CHAMANLAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)

Heard Sri. Shivraj S. Balloli, learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.6 and 7 and Sri. Abhishek Malipatil, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1-State through video conference.

Respondent No.2 is served and unrepresented.

2. The petitioners/accused Nos.6 and 7 have filed this petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.(Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.1325/2013 pending on the file of learned IV JMFC, Belagavi for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 384, 386, 389, 392, 397, 419, 420, 465, 467, 471, 170 and 120(B) of IPC.

3. As per the order sheet in C.C.No.1325/2013 on the file of learned IV JMFC, Belagavi, it appears that the defacto complainant has filed a memo dated 31.10.2022 for withdrawal of the complaint. The said memo reads as follows:

Herein the original complainant in the above case submits as under:

1. That he has filed a complaint against the above named accused persons in Udyambag Police Station Cr No. 74/2011 for the offences punishable U/S. 341, 385, 506(2), read with Sec. 34 of IPC, andin pursuance of the FIR registered a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top