SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41347

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K.MANMADHA RAO
SRI R ANAND – Appellant
Versus
SMT ANJINAMMA – Respondent


CAV ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners (defendants No.9 to 17) to quash the order dated 30.01.2018 passed in O.S.No.175/2011, on the file of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Devanahalli (‘the trial Court for short).

2. The petitioners herein are the defendants No.9 to 17 before the trial Court and the respondents No.1 to 3 herein are the plaintiffs No.1 to 3 before the trial Court and the respondents No.4 to 8 herein are the defendants No.1 and 8 before the trial Court.

3. For convenience of reference the parties are referred as arrayed before the trial Court.

4. The Brief facts of the case are that:-The plaintiffs filed suit for partition and separate possession seeking share in the suit schedule properties of their 3/8th share in the plaint schedule properties.

5. It is the case of the plaintiffs that they, along with defendants No.1 to 8, constitute an undivided Hindu Joint Family, being coparceners in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties, which are their ancestral joint family properties. The properties originally belonged to one Patel Mare Gowda, S/o Narase Gowda, who purchased the same under a registered sale deed dated 01.08.1952 execut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top