Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. R. NATARAJ, J
MR. APPALAL CHAKOLI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and nature of disputes (Para 3) |
| 2. jurisdictional challenges in proceedings (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. competent authority's role and authority (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. effect of kpidfe act on other laws (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. writ petitions allowed; termination of proceedings (Para 16) |
| 6. order for claimant to approach authority (Para 17) |
ORAL ORDER
dated 31.01.2025 passed by the respondent No.2, by which a memo filed by him for rejection of the dispute, was rejected.(ii) In WP No.17816/2025 The respondent No.4 is a society registered under the provisions of the KARNATAKA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI ACT, 1997 (henceforth referred to as ‘the Act, 1997’ for short).The respondent No.5 is the Chief Executive Officer, the respondent No.6 is the President, and the respondent No.7 is the competent authority. The respondent No.3 being a member of the respondent No.4 had deposited certain sums of money in the form of a fixed deposit with the respondent No.4. The respondent No.3 in this petition filed separate disputes before the respondent No.2 under Section 39 of the Act, 1997, for refund of the unpai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
