SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41362

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ
MR. APPALAL CHAKOLI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

The petitioner in WP No.20508/2025 has challenged an order bearing No.f.Dgï.r./PÀ.gÁ.¸Ë.¸ÀA.¸À.¤/1601/2022-23 dated 31.01.2025 passed by the respondent No.2, by which a memo filed by him for rejection of the dispute, was rejected.

2. The petitioner in WP No.20135/2025 has challenged an order bearing No.f.Dgï.r./PÀ.gÁ.¸Ë.¸ÀA.¸À.¤/17/2022-23 dated 31.01.2025 passed by the respondent No.2, by which a memo filed by him for rejection of the dispute, was rejected.

3. The petitioner in WP No.20346/2025 has challenged an order bearing No.f.Dgï.r./PÀ.gÁ.¸Ë.¸ÀA.¸À.¤/1895/2022-23 dated 27.12.2024 passed by the respondent No.2, by which a memo filed by him for rejection of the dispute, was rejected.

4. The petitioner in WP No.20441/2025 has challenged an order bearing No.f.Dgï.r./PÀ.gÁ.¸Ë.¸ÀA.¸À.¤/1600/2022-23 dated 31.01.2025 passed by the respondent No.2, by which a memo dated 03.02.2024 filed by him for rejection of the dispute, was rejected.

5. The petitioner in WP No.20517/2025 has challenged an order bearing No.f.Dgï.r./PÀ.gÁ.¸Ë.¸ÀA.¸À.¤/1596/2022-23 dated 31.01.2025 passed by the respondent No.2, by which a memo filed by him for rejection of the dispute, was rejected.

6. The respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top