SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41393


WP No. 19851 of 2023 HC-KAR AND 1 OTHER IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI WRIT PETITION NO. 17649 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9602 OF 2023 WRIT PETITION NO. 19851 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 23972 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
IN WP No. 17649/2023 BETWEEN:
SMT LALITHAMMA W/O MUKUNDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED AGRICULTURIST R/O INDIRA NAGARA, NEAR WATER TANK KOPPA AT AND POST CHIKKAMAGALUR-577126 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.P.P.HEGDE, SR.COUNSEL FOR SMT.RACHITHA Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYAN RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
N Location: High Court of Karnataka AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH N R POLICE REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560001
2. SRI BHARATH B Y S/O B V YATHIRAJA WP No. 19851 of 2023 HC-KAR AND 1 OTHER R/O HONAPURA, KOSALLI(P)
NIDIGE HOBLI, GAJANURU SHIMOGGA-577202 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI.SHARATH.S.GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DTD: 05.08.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NR PURA IN C.C.NO. 271/2020 VIDE ANNX-E AND ETC., IN CRL.P NO. 9602/2023 BETWEEN:
1. SRI BHARATH B Y S/O B Y YATHIRAJ, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT HOMAPURA VILLAGE, HOSAHALLI POST, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577202
2. B Y YATHIRAJ S/O B M VENKATE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT HOMAPURA VILLAGE, HOSAHALLI POST, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577202 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARATH S GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE BY R T NAGAR P S J C NAGAR, SUB DIVISION, WP No. 19851 of 2023 HC-KAR AND 1 OTHER BANGALORE-560001 REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
2. SRI MOHAMMED RAFI S/O MOHAMMED KASIM, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O NO 17, 10 A CROSS, K H B MAIN ROAD, MANORAYANAPALYA, R T NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560032 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI.P.P.HEGDE, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI.VENKATESH SUMAREDDI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO 1.QUASH THE FIR AND PRIVATE COMPLAINT REGISTERED IN CR.NO.49/2017 DATED 23.02.2017 BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE R.T.NAGAR P.S., ON THE FILE OF 4TH A.C.M.M, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU CITY VIDE ANNEXURE A AND B RESPECTIVELY AND ETC., IN WP NO. 19851/2023 BETWEEN:
MR OMKAR V B S/O BADIYAPPAAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT 20/2 SHANTHI BHAVANA NARASIMHARAJAPURA TALUK, BALE, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 134 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI.P.P.HEGDE, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI.VENKATESH SUMAREDDI, ADVOCATE)
WP No. 19851 of 2023 HC-KAR AND 1 OTHER AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA NR PURA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001
2. BHARATH B Y S/O YATHIRAJ B V AGED MAJOR, R/AT HONNAPURA, HOSAHALLI POST, NIDIGE HOBLI, SHIVAMOGGA KARNATAKA-577 201 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.LAKSHMAN, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI.SHARATH.S.GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC 271/2020 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NARASIMHARAJAPURA VIDE ANNEXURE-C REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 35, 37, 201, 417, 419, 406, 420, 120B, 323, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED.
IN WP NO. 23972/2023 BETWEEN:
RAJESH. K. N.
S/O MUNKUNDEGOWDA, AGED 37 YEARS, R/A GADEKERE, SIDDARAMATH, KOPPA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU 577126 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAJWAL B PATIL, ADVOCATE)
WP No. 19851 of 2023 HC-KAR AND 1 OTHER AND:
11. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH N R PURA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY HIGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560001
22. BHARATH B Y S/O YATHIRAJ B V, R/A HONNAPURA, HOSAHALLI POST, NIDIGE HOBLI, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA-577202 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.LAKSHMAN, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI.SHARATH.S.GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC.271/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-D ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NARASIMHARAJAPURA VIDE ANNEXURE-D REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 35, 37, 201, 417, 419, 406, 120B, 323, 506 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR DICTATING ORDERS, THIS DAY ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI WP No. 19851 of 2023 HC-KAR AND 1 OTHER

COMMON ORDER

W.P.No.23972/2023 and W.P.No.19851/2023 are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 482 Cr.P.C, respectively by accused Nos.1 and 3, with a prayer to quash criminal proceedings initiated against them in C.C.No.271/2020, on the file of Civil Judge and JMFC Narasimharajapura, for the offences punishable under Sections 35, 37, 201, 417, 419, 406, 120-B, 323, 506 r/w Section 34 IPC.

2. Petitioner in W.P.No.17649/2023 has challenged the order dated 20.02.2020 passed by the trial Court in the above case i.e, C.C No.271/2020 rejecting the application filed by her under Section 457 Cr.P.C and order dated 05.08.2023, partly allowing the application filed by respondent No.2/ complainant filed under Section 457 Cr.P.C and releasing part of the seized amount to his interim custody.

3. W.P.No.9602/2023 is filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2 under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against them in C.C.No.7839/2018 arising out of Cr.No.49/2017 for the offences punishable and Sections 406, 420, 504, 506, 120-B r/w Section 34 IPC.

4. Since the facts giving rise to these petitions are interlinked and common, the petitions are clubbed together and disposed off by a common order.

5. In support of their petitions, accused Nos.1 and 3 of C.C No.271/2020 have contended that they are innocent of the offences alleged and have been falsely implicated. They are in no way connected to the alleged incident. There is no material to show that they are involved in the alleged incident. Except the allegations that they persuaded respondent No.2 to invest in the Rice pulling instrument, there are no allegations against them. Continuation of the proceedings would amount to abuse of the process of the Court and hence, the petitions.

6. On the other hand learned counsel representing respondent No.2 and learned High Court Government Pleader representing respondent No.1 State would submit that respondent No.2 is an agriculturist. He came in contact with accused No.2 Nandan Kumar, who is his neighbour. In the last week of September 2016, when he visited the house of accused No.2 Nandan Kumar, in connection with festival feast, accused No.2 told him about Rice pulling instrument and that it is worth hundreds of Crores of rupees and that if he makes investment in the same, he could get handsome returns. Respondent No.2 brought this fact to the notice of his friend Imthiaz (CW-2).

6.1 After one week, accused No.2 Nandan Kumar introduced him to accused No.3 Omkar @ Vijaykumar at N.R.Pura camp. He also said that there is huge profit investing in Rice pulling instrument. They called a Swamiji over phone and all of them went to meet the said Swamiji. However, he was not available and directed them to visit Sadguru Sevashrama and that he would send Junior Swamiji. Accordingly, they went to Sadguru Sevashrama, Hosadurga and met a junior Swamiji. He also spoke about the Rice pulling instrument and collected the details of respondent No.2, so that he would see whether God is favouring him in the said business. Later accused No.3 Omkar @ Vijaykumar, informed respondent No.2 that Swamiji conveyed that it is favourable for respondent No.2 to invest.

6.2 On the next day they again went to Hosadurga and met accused Nos.2 and 3. They informed respondent No.2 that some company is interested in testing the Rice pulling instrument, but it requires Rs.40 - 45 lakhs. When accused Nos.2 and 3 called Senior Swamiji, he also confirmed the said fact. The Senior Swamiji refused to disclose his name. Respondent No.2 expressed his inability and returned. However, after one week accused Nos.2 and 3 contacted him and said that a foreign company by name Verbund International, Ostria, U.K is interested and Dr.V.K.Singh, CEO of the said company are discussing about the same and took him to Bengaluru and introduced to accused No.4 Mohammad Rafi and another at ITC International hotel. They informed that they are interested in testing the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top