Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. V SRISHANANDA, J
DEVARAJ, S/O. LATE NARASEEYAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. NARASIMHA RAJU S/O. LATE NARASIMHAIAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and inheritance of the property. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. appeal against trial court's dismissal. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. counsel's arguments support appeal. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. requirement of evidence for title claim. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. final dismissal of the appeal confirmed. (Para 26 , 27) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard Sri.Umesh Moolimani, learned counsel for the appellant and Smt.Vijaya M. N., learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 4.
2. Plaintiffs have filed the present appeal challenging the validity of the judgments passed by the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court in dismissing the suit for declaration and consequential relief of permanent injunction in respect of the following property (hereinafter referred to as suit property):
A part and parcel of the land bearing Sy.No.125/1, measuring 4 acres 17 gt plus kharab of 02 gt situated at Taridal village, Thondebhavi Hobli, Gowribidanur Taluk and bounded by:
East by – lands of Kunti Basappa and Lakshmidevamma
West by – land of hazi Miani son of Abdul Sattar Sab
North by – lands of Hanumanthappa
South by – lands of Mallanna and others
3. Facts in the nut shell fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
