Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. V SRISHANANDA, J
SRI. D.K. THIMMANNA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. D B THIMMANNA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendant borrowed money and issued a cheque. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendant denied claims and alleged forgery. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. plaintiff provided evidence for loan and cheque. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. appeal arguments challenging the first appellate court's judgment. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court dismissed the appeal, upholding the first appellate court's decision. (Para 21) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. B.M. Siddappa, learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for the respondents.
2. First defendant is the appellant challenging the judgement of the First Appellate Court in R.A.No.31/2008 whereby suit of the plaintiff came to be decreed reversing the dismissal of the suit in O.S. No.103/2014.
3. The facts of the case which are utmost necessary for disposal of the present appeal are as under:
A suit for recovery of money in a sum of Rs.3 Lakhs came to be filed by the plaintiff with interest at 18% per annum from the date of suit till realization by contending that the defendant has borrowed money in a sum of Rs.3 Lakhs in the month of October 2013 to meet the legal necessity of his family. He had promised to repay the same within two months. When plaintiff demanded the money, defendant s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
