ORAL JUDGMENT

Heard Miss.Karthika Nair, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.C.Vamshi Krishna, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri.V.B.Siddaramaiah, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6.

2. Present second appeal is filed by the defendant challenging the decree passed in O.S.No.683/2012 declaring that plaintiffs are the owners of the suit schedule property and defendant being restrained from interfering with the following property (hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property):

Sy.No.95/4 measuring 3.22 guntas out of 1.23 guntas, situated at Belagumba village, Kasaba Hobli, Tumakuru Taluk, bounded by:

East – Remaining land in same survey number

West – Land of Chikkarangaiah

North – Land of Chikkarangaiah, now his son Ganganna is in possession.

South – Land of Doddaiah and Hanumantharayappa

3. Facts which are utmost necessary for disposal of the present appeal are as under:

3.1. In respect of the suit property, a suit for declaration and consequential relief of permanent injunction is filed by the plaintiffs against the defendant.

3.2. In the plaint, it is contended that land bearing Sy.No.95 measuring 11 acres 4 guntas situated in Belagumba village, Kasaba Hobli,