SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41470

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
SMT G R LAKSHMINARASAMMA @ R LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
SRI NARASAPPA – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

Heard Sri.Chowda Reddy T.M., learned counsel for the appellant.

2. None appears for the respondents.

3. The unsuccessful plaintiff is the appellant in the second appeal challenging the judgment and decree in O.S.No.603/2012 whereby, suit of the plaintiff for permanent injunction came to be dismissed in respect of the following property (hereinafter referred as 'suit property') which has been confirmed in R.A.No.118/2019:-

"Property bearing H.L.No.24/B, measuring East to West 36 feet and North to South 34 feet, situated at Rayappanahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Chickballapur Taluk, bounded on:-

East by : Plaintiff’s own property,

West by : Road,

North by : Road,

South by : Property of defendants No.1."

4. Facts in brief which are utmost necessary for disposal of the present appeal are as under:-

4.1 A suit for permanent injunction came to be filed by the plaintiff in respect of the suit property contending that she is the Donee in the gift deed executed by her father, in view of the fact that her father had no male issues in respect of the suit property.

4.2 It is further contention of the plaintiff that based on the gift deed, she is in possession and enjoyment of the property. D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top