SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41523

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
VIKRAM. G. P. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

The petitioner – accused No.1 is before this Court seeking quashment of the proceedings in C.C.No.373/2024, pending before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Belur, for the offences under Sections 504, 506 and 341 of the IPC.

2. Heard Sri Pratheep K.C., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.N.Jagadeesh, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 is served and remains unrepresented.

3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:

Petitioner is accused No.1 and respondent No.2, the complainant. It transpires that, between the petitioner and respondent No.2 a civil suit in O.S.No.496/2023 is pending consideration and the petitioner has the benefit of an order of injunction granted by the concerned civil Court on 27.11.2023. After the grant of injunction, it transpires that respondent No.2 – complainant registers a complaint in Crime No.7/2024 for offences punishable under Sections 323, 354, 506 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015, making several allegations against the petitioner. Respondent No.1 – police, after investigation filed a charge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top