SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41527

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
SMT.SUMANGALI – Appellant
Versus
SMT.LINGAMMA – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

Heard Sri.Muniyappa, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri.Somashekhar Kashimath, learned counsel for contesting respondent Nos.1 to 3.

2. Present appeal is filed by the plaintiffs namely Sumangali and Shivagange daughters of Late Siddamma against the respondents – Lingamma and others. Appellants are unsuccessful plaintiffs who had filed the suit for partition and separate possession in O.S.No.09/2012 in respect of the following immovable property (hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property):

“A country tiled house with vacant space bearing assessment No.178 measuring East to West 8.20 x North to South 8.80 meters, situated at 15th Ward, Naik’s street, Chikkamamsada Beedi, Gundlupet Town, bounded on,

East – Road

West – House of Rachanaika

North – House of Puttanaika

South – House of Amavase Naika”

3. In the plaint, it is contended that Chennanaika resident of Gundlupet village and his wife by name Bodamma died long back. They had a daughter by name Muddamma and she had married to one Kullanaika and said Kullanaika is also no more. Couple Kullanaika and Muddamma had two daughters namely Puttamma and Siddamma. Said Puttamma again had two children namely Siddaraju an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top