THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V SRISHANANDA
SMT.SUMANGALI – Appellant
Versus
SMT.LINGAMMA – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard Sri.Muniyappa, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri.Somashekhar Kashimath, learned counsel for contesting respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. Present appeal is filed by the plaintiffs namely Sumangali and Shivagange daughters of Late Siddamma against the respondents – Lingamma and others. Appellants are unsuccessful plaintiffs who had filed the suit for partition and separate possession in O.S.No.09/2012 in respect of the following immovable property (hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property):
“A country tiled house with vacant space bearing assessment No.178 measuring East to West 8.20 x North to South 8.80 meters, situated at 15th Ward, Naik’s street, Chikkamamsada Beedi, Gundlupet Town, bounded on,
East – Road
West – House of Rachanaika
North – House of Puttanaika
South – House of Amavase Naika”
3. In the plaint, it is contended that Chennanaika resident of Gundlupet village and his wife by name Bodamma died long back. They had a daughter by name Muddamma and she had married to one Kullanaika and said Kullanaika is also no more. Couple Kullanaika and Muddamma had two daughters namely Puttamma and Siddamma. Said Puttamma again had two children namely Siddaraju an




Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.