Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. V SRISHANANDA, J
KHALEEL S/O LATE SABJAN SAB – Appellant
Versus
E SHIVAMURTHY HIGH COURT OF S/O LATE ESHWARAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership dispute over the suit property. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's evaluation of the evidence and previous judgments. (Para 8 , 9 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. arguments for appellants challenging lower court judgment. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. principles on how title vs. revenue entries interact. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. final order to dismiss the appeal. (Para 23) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. Defendant Nos.1 and 2 are the appellants in the present Regular Second Appeal challenging the validity of the judgment and decree passed in R.A.No.68/2018 dated 21.07.2022 on the file of the Spl. II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.33/2013 dated 13.07.2018 on the file of the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Chitradurga, dismissing the suit of the plaintiff for the relief of declaration and injunction in respect of the following property, hereinafter referred to as ‘suit property’.
East : Land of late Eshwarappa, West : Land of Hanumanthappa, North : Land of Rudrappa, South : Land of Chigaterappa”.
3.1 Plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of the suit property by contending that he
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
