Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR, J
SMT. SHANTHAMMA K – Appellant
Versus
MR. BRIJESH REDDY C – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved in appeal and context. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background regarding the land and agreements. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. rejection of prior temporary injunction applications. (Para 7) |
| 4. arguments for and against the appeal. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. key legal issues and points for consideration. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. discussion of agreements and attorney issues. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. evaluation of plaintiffs' prima facie case. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 19) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the plaintiffs questioning the order dated 12.02.2025 passed on I.A.No.IV filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC in O.S.No.968/2021 on the file of III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru1, thereby, the application filed for seeking to grant an order of temporary injunction not to change the nature of lands is dismissed.
hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trial Court’ for short
2. For the sake of convenience and easy reference, the parties are referred to as per their rankings before the Trial Court.
3. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for declaration to declare that certain sale deeds,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
